Is Britain’s New Gas Plan a Blackout Comedy?
Rishi Sunak’s latest pitch for more gas-fired power stations isn’t exactly the hero’s journey we’re hoping for. It feels more like a plot twist in a thriller where the villain is the rising energy bill.
The Real Deal
- Half the gas we use is imported. That’s not a brag, that’s a red flag.
- The North Sea’s production is slipping faster than a toddler’s bedtime routine. It’s on the brink of a quiet dip.
- New gas stations mean more dependence on fossil fuels. As tariffs climb, so do our grocery receipts.
The Government’s Bold Move
With elections looming, it feels like a last‑minute stunt rather than a step toward sustainability. Ministers talk about “blackouts” as if they’re a modern‑day threat, yet the plan suggests we’ll keep turning the lights on just by buying more gas.
Why The Numbers Don’t Add Up
- Sunak says we must hit our 2035 net‑zero goals. Yet this involves burning more gas, which is a fossil flare‑up.
- “We’re already halfway to net‑zero,” he says. True, that’s emissions, not energy security.
- He promises to “make tough decisions.” The toughest decision? Not letting people choose clean energy for fear of the lights going out.
Expert Counterpoints
Jess Ralston (ECIU): The North Sea will decline whether we license new stations or not. (No code block allowed)
Doug Parr (Greenpeace UK): “The government’s cunning plan to boost energy security is actually a recipe for increased fossil fuel dependency.”
Without carbon capture technology, new gas plants will only survive a decade or two before they’re scrapped. Who’s starving to pay for that? The answer is not the taste‑tasting pennies we’re pocketing from bills.
Bottom Line: The Gas Monopoly Game
Our current trajectory is a low‑cost, high‑risk game plan that leaves us in a trade‑off: choose between clean energy or a flickering, smoky future. We can’t make that choice, so we’re left watching the lights go dark.
Get real‑time updates on this post category directly on your device! Subscribe now.
