“One‑in, One‑out” Gets a Reality Check
So, the UK and France signed a fresh “one‑in, one‑out” migration deal, and it quickly turned into the tables of fervent debate the government didn’t expect. The treaty says that France can refuse to send back any migrants they suspect might be “a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of any of the Schengen States.”
Blindfolding the Process?
- Human Rights Hurdles – Even a completely baseless or “made‑up” human‑rights claim can halt a return to France while it fidgets through a lengthy court process.
- No Numbers, No Stakes – The treaty doesn’t put any concrete figures on the table. Apparently, it’s rare because, out of the 94% who stay, only 6% actually get sent back. That’s not so deterrent‑friendly.
- Information Blackout – France is basically told that it can’t give any details at all about the migrants it ships to the UK. Meaning the UK might receive dangerous criminals or even potential terrorists without a clue.
Frankly, It’s a “Won’t‑Work” Deal
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp had a line for this: “This is a bureaucrat’s dream and a lawyer’s paradise, set up to keep people from ever being returned to France.” That’s the kind of statement that ruffles Cambridge footie team apparel and read‑and‑pause nostalgia of Cold War treaties.
Key Claims in the Treaty
Because the treaty reads:
- At the time of transfer, the UK will confirm that the person does not have an outstanding human‑rights claim.
- French officials refuse to share any data about the migrants they’re sending.
- Under no circumstances will personal data transfer from France to the UK.
- Any data shared the other way will only happen if necessary for the implementation of the agreement.
If this sounds like a tongue‑in‑cheek version of “We won’t share your secrets, unless we have to,” you’re right on the money. Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron and former UK Prime Minister Mike G. Royal all say, “We’re doing this for the best interests of our citizens.” Meanwhile, critics fear the policy is merely a “sanctuary”.
Closing the Loop
Indeed, the article suggests that using a “one‑in, one‑out” agreement probably won’t stop migration—especially when governments can resort to satirical legal manoeuvres. The bottom line? The UK’s new policy may end up calling for “bad deal” propaganda instead of meaningful migration management.
