Will Sir Keir Starmer End Up in the History Bin? The Stirring Warning From Lord Richard Dannatt
So, if you’re following the battleground that is the UK’s defence budget, you’ve probably heard a chuckle from the former head of the British Army, Lord Richard Dannatt. He’s issued a stern pep‑talk to Sir Keir Starmer and the Defence Minister, Rachel Reeves: if they’re not bumping up defence spending by a solid 3 % to 3.5 % of GDP, history might remember them as the ones who let the army’s stomach grow empty.
Why It Matters
The upcoming defence review is supposed to be a deep dive into how the army is funded and equipped. But Dannatt warns it’s at risk of getting “hollowed out” — like a cheap sofa that’s been whacked too hard, losing its shape and support. He sees that as a real setback for the Prime Minister and the Chancery, a glitch so big it could be numbered among the government’s biggest blunders.
Starmer’s Stubborn Stand
- 2.5% commitment – Starmer’s pledge is to hit the 2.5% mark of GDP, which is part of Labour’s election platform.
- Not Enough Room – Dannatt calls that figure a “half‑step” that’s simply not far enough for a modern army.
- Brakes & Balance – While Sir Keir tries to keep the budget sensible, raising it to the levels experts crave will spend the same mental headspace of “something like’,
- Potential fallout – If the plan stalls, the army’s lose a little vitality as comparably, likewise losing relevance in the debate about national defence.
Who’s Watching?
The world will be watching to see if the Prime Minister and Rachel Reeves pull the trigger on the higher spending, or if the army will indeed be “stuck in a history bin.” If they do the latter, the only honour left might be their propensity for sharing a laugh while the army’s lurches about.
Kyiv will not accept any deal made by Trump and Putin without Ukraine
Zelensky: I don’t see a ‘ready US plan’ for ending Ukraine war
US and EU officials blast Trump over Hegseth’s ‘surrender & betrayal’ of Ukraine
Who’s Packing Their Bags: A Kick‑Sharp Look at Russia’s 150K‑Troop Gamble
In a recent round‑table with BBC Radio 4’s The Week in Westminster, Lord Dannatt warned the world—and a few home‑grown politicians—that Russia’s new elite forces are getting ready to throw a Tuesday afternoon punch at Kyiv. The “15 divisions” are supposedly armed to the teeth and band‑wagoned with 150,000 soldiers, all set to be unleashed if Pyro Russia decides it wants in the big game.
Starmer, Reeves, and the “We Must Eat Food, Not Fight” Dilemma
Lord Dannatt’s key take‑away: “Unless Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves can finally admit that defense matters more than diverting money to potholes, health care, or even the latest educational curriculum, the entire defence review is destined to be a tragedy of epic proportions.” He followed that up with a red‑carpet diagnosis: “If the UK keeps spending only 2.5 % of GDP on defence, this review will be a dumpster‑fire of half‑measured policies. Keir Starmer’ll become the historical oddity known as ‘The Poorly‑Budgeted PM.’”
Trump Toasts Toward a Five‑Percent GDP Squeeze
The U.S. president is already shouting “Raise your defences to 5 % of GDP!” from the cauldron of his own rhetoric. With NATO members is by most informal “line‑up” — basically a set of good‑looking and well‑budgeted allies. Even if Russia decides to shoot up their engines, NATO is pre‑emptively tightening the budget belt, or at least is hoping it does.
Britain’s “100,000 Peacekeepers” Dilemma
Starmer suggested sending British troops to Ukraine as peacekeepers, but Lord Dannatt replied that it would probably need about 100,000 troops – a number the UK simply can’t muster. The armed forces are “run‑down” right now, totally out‑of‑date in terms of both numbers and equipment. The brain‑frying conclusion: think before you go, soldier.
- UK defence budget currently 2.5 % of GDP.
- Translating that into troops: 100,000 peacekeepers might be a dream.
- It’s embarrassing — and likely to be a logistical nightmare.
- Fix the numbers and the equipment before you fix this.
Bottom Line: Your Job is the Left‑Wing Elevator Oops It Means Keep Your Head Down and Tap the Budget
In a nutshell, Russia’s soldiers are geared up, the US is upping the economic stakes, and the UK is stuck with an army that looked like a game of Tetris after hours. If the UK wants to be better than a footnote in an academic report, maybe it’s time to face the truth: priority’s actually about defence, not just potholes. Let’s hope the sun rises on a better budget allocation. Until then, soldiers will keep packing and leaders keep delivering lines they never actually listen to.
