Could Ukraine Be Building a Mini‑Atom Bomb in the Next Few Months?
What The Latest Report Claims
According to a research paper from a Ukrainian think‑tank, the Centre for Army, Conversion and Disarmament Studies opens up a frightening possibility: Kyiv could piece together a relatively small nuclear device in a matter of weeks—about one‑tenth the strength of the bomb that fell on Nagasaki in 1945.
The “Easy” Blueprint
Here are the key take‑aways from the report, presented as if reading a DIY guide (but far less friendly):
- Seven Tons of Reactor Plutonium—that’s roughly the torus of a large nuclear reactor, and the figure the paper quotes as available to Ukraine.
- Less is More—to create a full‑blown arsenal you’d need significantly less material than the current stockpile.
- Manhattan Project 2.0—the paper claims “80 years later, making a simple atomic bomb is still not that hard.”
Why This Matters (And Why It Grows Fuzzier)
According to the paper, if President Donald Trump were to stop giving Ukraine that crucial military aid, the door to building such a bomb would remain wide open. In other words, the claim hinges on the scenario that U.S. support suddenly pulls out.
Who Are the People Behind These Numbers?
The voice behind the allegations is not a national security agency; it’s a local think‑tank. That makes the source a bit of a mystery—think of it as an “in‑house Sherlock” looking for a problem without having the full dossier.
Putting It All Together
In plain English, the report paints a scary picture: with enough plutonium, a relatively small nuclear weapon could be assembled in a short time, given the right backing (or lack of it). While the claim is still far from the dramatic wham‑bang of a “Fat Man,” it puts a dent in the room for policymakers, and it should be treated as a call for vigilance rather than a thriller plot.
Berlin claims Kyiv is weeks away from making a nuclear weapon
Johnson warns UK will ‘send British troops to Ukraine’ if US cuts aid to Kyiv
Ukraine’s army ‘in a lot of trouble’ as thousands of North Korean troops engage in combat
Russia Gets Ready for a “Massive Attack” While Ukraine Buzzes About Nukes
In a tightening geopolitical drama, Russian officials hint at a potential salvo that could reshape Eastern Europe.
What’s the Russian Game Plan?
Russian leadership says they have sufficient stockpiles for “hundreds of warheads,” each with a tactical yield of several kilotons. The plan? Fire them at Ukrainian airbases and other critical hubs—basically, “a take‑out menu for the whole theater.” The threat feels like a night‑time pop‑up: sudden, devastating, and ready to deploy at a moment’s notice.
NATO’s Winter Warning
- The alliance flagged Ukraine’s harshest winter yet, underscoring the added strain on troops and civilians.
- “If Russia takes Ukraine, millions of citizens would die under occupation—no party favors a gulag,” warned a think‑tank director.
Zelensky’s Bold Move: Nuclear or Nothing?
Former President Zelensky has thrown down a bold proposition: if NATO doors remain shut, Ukraine may “build nuclear weapons in weeks.” Nuclear armament has always been a taboo—but desperation can sting. “Either we get nuclear armaments or we find another alliance,” he told EU officials, painting a grim picture if neutrality fails.
Why Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry is Saying “No, We’re Not Building Nukes”
The Ukrainian authorities countered loudly: “We’re committed to the Non‑Proliferation Treaty. We do not possess, develop, or plan to acquire nuclear weapons.” They’ve also highlighted cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, stressing transparency and compliance.
The Bottom Line
With Russia polishing up its arsenal and Ukraine itching for power, the region stands at a tense crossroads. NATO’s warnings suggest a bleak winter ahead, while the Ukrainian leadership oscillates between bold claims and official denials. It’s a high‑stakes chess game with potentially life‑changing moves. Stay tuned for the next update—because whoever wins here could redraw the map for years to come.
