Nigel Farage Calls for an Exit from the ECHR, with a Sidelined U‑Turn on French Collusion
*In a recent speech, Nigel Farage—Reform UK’s outspoken figure—has declared that the UK must fully exit the European Courts of Human Rights (ECHR). He argues taxpayers are beyond tolerance of the parliament’s “moot‑talk” about cat‑aficionado unity and a growing “migrant deluge.”
The former UKIP leader also struck back at Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Emmanuel Macron, accusing both of “colluding” to facilitate what he calls a “massive migrant invasion across the English Channel.”
Key Points Farage Made During the Rally
*- “No ifs, no buts,” – Farage emphatically stated that leaving the ECHR is a non‑negotiable decision, “no ifs, no buts.”
- He cited a staggering £800 million already spilt to France on the edge of the Channel, while French naval vessels allegedly escort small boats to a 12‑mile line where the UK’s border force or RNLI volunteers will hoist survivors.
- Farage warned that once the border troops pick up the migrants, they hand the life‑jackets back to the French for the next wave—reinforcing his claim that two governments are colluding to streamline smuggling operations.
- He blasted that the “criminal activity” is being silently approved by the French and the UK, and claimed taxpayers have had “enough of hearing it.”
With the chattering of diplomatic tongues at an all‑comedy, Farage points out that foreign aid to France has – in his words – become a “moneymaking smuggling support. ’s right? The lengthy reparations? the hidden layers of life‑jacket exchange?
Changed Narrative: A Simple Summary
*- Farage claims Britain should ditch the ECHR and urges the public to abandon the “migrant bonanza.”
- He sounds out Keir Starmer and Macron as conspirators “colluding” to support an unauthorized migrant influx.
- He argues that French funding hasn’t just gone in, it’s getting “re‑used” way beyond humanitarian intent.
- Finally, he warns that this legal (or not) partnership between the UK and France may “continue to undercut national security.”
Whether or not this would alter future policies or send a flicker through European law, it’s clear the loud‑noisy voice is far from quietly tossed into the archives—it’s on the mic, shouting about boundaries and freedoms—how ironic.
Labour could plan to move migrants into flats and HMOs in a town near you
Starmer told to hold ‘emergency meeting’ as ‘concern’ grows as ‘to where the migrants will go’
Dozens of councils ‘instructing’ legal teams for advice to rid hotels of boat migrants
France using UK as a ‘dumping ground for illegal migrants’
Farage’s Frank‑Forth Plan for Illegal Migrants
When Nigel Farage hits the podium, he doesn’t tiptoe around the word “migrant.” He’s ready to pull the plug on those who cross borders without a visa, claim “no nonsense” and promise that “planes will take off,” no more. In plain terms: nobody gets to stay once they get on the bus.
What’s on the Ticket?
- Detinent & Deport – Anyone found in the UK illegally will be handed a detention card and sent home. No exceptions.
- No More “Human Rights Evasion” – He’s calling out what he calls the “malign influences” that help migrants stay. Farage wants the law to protect the country, not act like a universal “human‑rights lobby.”
- Priorities, Priorities, Priorities – British security, safety of women, and protecting the future. That’s the top of his priority list.
Piers Pottinger: “They’re Just Saying What People Want.”
During a GB News interview, commentator Piers Pottinger backed Farage’s “no‑ifs, no‑buts” approach. He said:
“Yes, absolutely. This plan is radical, but it’s crystal clear what Farage is going to do. The bulk of the electorate want to see this stop ground–up. No more deterrence, just terminating the issue once and for all.”
Pottinger also nudged that there’s still a bit of back‑stitching needed. The British Rights Bill Farage hinted at hasn’t yet passed, and a clever legal tug‑of‑war may wait to pop up again. He noted that former Secretary of State Dominic Raab had tried to pass heavy‑handed immigration rules but ran into those pesky “technical legal hurdles.”
Does This Mean the End of the ECHR? The Human Rights Act?
Farage says the UK should be free to ditch the European Convention on Human Rights and pull back from the UK Human Rights Act. If that’s true, the wide‑angled debate is about whether the majority of voters really want it so. Think about it: a literal “no‑deportation” “switch” happens whenever the system is mocked or misrepresented.
As far as Keir Starmer is concerned, he’s being called “on the side of outdated international treaties and human‑rights lawyers.” Farage challenges the notion that “British security” is the last frontier. He’s asking: Do we really want to leave people outside the gate, or do we want the biggest puzzle solved with a direct, uncomplicated solution? That’s up for debate.
The Punchline: “Planes Will Take Off, and Plenty of Them”
Farage’s blunt rhetoric has its supporters, but it also invites some readers to take a pause and think a bit. No one’s whispering inside the prayer‑line should be left unchecked. The final question remains: which narrative will win the next election campaign and shape Britain’s future?
