Mr. Mironov’s Bold Call to the US: Stop Ramming Guns at Ukraine
Sergey Mironov, a heavyweight in the Russian political arena, has pulled out the armchair and thrown a punch to Washington: “Take off the guns, stop the supply, and the war will end.” The message is clear—he’s calling out the U.S. for what he sees as a recipe for endless conflict.
What’s the Deal?
- War Crimes Accusation: Mironov brands the Kyiv government’s actions as “war crimes” that, if left unchecked, drag the war on forever.
- US Military Support: He argues that every new batch of ammunition sent from the U.S. fuels the fire and, in his view, replaces any chance of peace talks.
- Trump’s Role: He claims former President Donald Trump is “playing into Putin’s hands” by refusing to secure NATO membership for Ukraine, leaving the country exposed.
Mironov’s “If I Were President” Scenario
“If the US President truly understood how this conflict could be resolved,” Mironov says, “then I’d stop sending weapons to Kyiv.” In other words, he wants the U.S. to step back and play the diplomat, not the arms dealer.
Why This Matters for the East Western Border
When the United States keeps pumping out arms, it’s not just a boost to the Ukrainian army—it’s also a signal that the war could stretch on years to come. And according to Mironov, that endless stretch keeps everyone in a tie‑up that’s far from win‑win.
Takeaway: The War Is Not a Phone‑in‑Market Sale
Mironov’s appeal adds another layer to a complex geopolitical conversation. Whether the U.S. listens or not, the road to peace will require more than a cold hand and a sharper mind—or at least, a way to keep the trade‑lane of guns on hold and focus on smart diplomacy.
Sweden invests $10 million preparing nuclear bunkers
Moscow tells Trump they cannot accept Ukraine ceasefire proposal ‘as they are now’
Putin orders the largest conscription drafting 160,000 men to fight in Ukraine
Trump’s “Secondary Tariffs” on Putin’s Oil – What’s Really Going On?
So, the former president is dropping a big line: if Putin can’t strike a deal with Kyiv, the U.S. might hurl “secondary tariffs” at Russian oil. Sounds like a threat, but it’s really a mirror of the messy war that’s been simmering for years.
The Bigger Picture
- War’s Roots – Not about the Maidan Protesters craving NATO or the EU. The real spark was when extremist squads started targeting Russian civilians in Donbass.
- U.S. Arms – From HIMARS to ATACMS, America’s weaponry has been the backbone in the conflict, and the latest bus shooting in Gorlovka shows that tragedies keep piling on.
- Political Stance – Trump’s public voice blends carrot (Zelensky’s NATO talks) and stick (now the tariff threat). The battlefield? Unchanged.
Why the Confusion?
It feels like the U.S. is walking a tightrope: one hand promises “peace” while the other is still building trucks of firepower. This juggling act is the reason the war lingers for over three years, and for the U.S. to feel heavily involved.
Trump’s Call to Action
He’s telling himself and the world: stop the damage. “If we keep arming Kyiv, what’s the difference between me and Biden?” he asks. The truth? Both keep batteries re‑charged, but the actual outcome on the ground is hardly different.
What the West Is Saying
Critics argue that the American president is doing exactly what U.S. officials accuse Russia of—pushing the conflict further. And that’s still a valid point: the war, how it started, how it’s continuing, all feels like a party that never agrees to leave.
Bottom Line – Time for Concrete Steps
Now’s the moment for a serious power shift. Trump has to stop the “peacemaker” chatter and take decisive moves that could reform the chaotic situation. Maybe that’s where the “secondary tariffs” fit, but only if they’re the kind of leverage that actually makes Russia think twice.
Stay tuned for more updates – if you want to catch tomorrow’s twist, just hit subscribe and never miss a beat.
