Sunak’s money‑munching plan: Cut benefits, drop NHS tax—see how the U.K. could shut the door on national insurance
Rishi Sunak has rolled out a bold, if controversial, charter: prune the “working‑age benefits” and, in a swoop, make the infamous national insurance tax a thing of the past. The Conservative keystone, he says, could pave the way for a cleaner, smaller tax bill if the Tories win the upcoming general election.
Why cut benefits? Why scrub national insurance?
- Tax‑cut ambition – Sunak argues that trimming support schemes for working adults provides the fiscal breathing room needed to slash taxes. “If we keep cutting taxes sustainably, we have to rethink the national insurance leviathan,” he told the Sunday Times.
- “Significant process” – The bloke says the government will move swiftly to abolish the tax on the “next parliament” if the Conservative Party secures a win. Think of it as a big budget makeover: less social security money, more free‑cash for the taxpayer.
- Economic ripple…or maybe a boycott – Economists murmur that taking away the tax could add to disposable income for the middle‑class, but could also dim the safety net for the very poor.
A quick snapshot of the plan
• Cuts to working‑age benefits – The government will trim a range of welfare allowances that are currently topping the list of public spending.
• National insurance removal – A future end for the payroll tax that charges everyone from cashiers to CEOs.
• Potential revamp of public pensions – If national insurance is gone, pensions may need a different source of funding.
The public reaction? A roller‑coaster.
Some voters cheer for a leaner tax code, while many worry that the cuts could backfire, raising the stakes for those who might rely on those very benefits. Tensions run high as the election approaches.
Stay tuned. The next general election isn’t just a political showdown – it might very well be a showdown for the nation’s tax infrastructure.
Hunt’s Spring Budget was ‘largely a case of too little, too late for most businesses’
Chancellor’s Spring Budget is telling the hospitality sector that ‘you are on your own’
Hunt’s Spring Budget is a ‘flop’ that could drive ‘hard working people and investors out of UK’
Sunak’s Bold Move: Slashing NICs and Heating Up Business Rates
According to the latest Office for Budget Responsibility numbers, business rates have gone up by a staggering £7.4 billion compared with 2010. And the Prime Minister isn’t just shrugging—he’s calling it a necessary correction to the money‑owings that buffet our work‑life.
The Plan in Plain English
- Sunak will phase out national insurance contributions (NICs). Think of it as removing that extra “service tax” on every paycheck.
- He’s also set his sights on “shifting the burden” to business rates, essentially tax‑pushing the cost of the services we get to our commercial landlords.
- Spending on welfare next year is expected to climb from £261.5 bn to £360.1 bn—Sunak says cutting NICs by a third in two quick moves proves he can actually deliver.
- There’s a critique that 2.5 million workers are now deemed “unfit to work” or “not looking for work”. Sunak calls this “a system that’s no longer fair.”
Why It Matters to Us
All that money finally ends back in the same pot that funds schools, hospitals and public services. Sunak’s approach is designed to:
- Reward those who hunt the job for more pay—by removing a layer of tax on their earnings.
- Simplify a tangled web of taxes that has been making people’s paychecks feel a bit unfair.
- Rationalise a system that tri‑scores more people out of the workforce than a decade ago.
Next Steps in the Next Parliament
Sunak says the plan is not a golden ticket but a progressive journey. He says “we will keep trimming NICs until it’s gone,” and that will “build the kind of society I think is right.” If all goes according to plan, the next set of laws will start implementing each step.
Takeaway
In short: Business rates up, NICs going away, and a public‑services message that tries to sound like a re‑balance of what’s fair in the UK. The next few years will tell if it’s a win‑win or a recipe for a tax roller coaster.
