Kellogg Calls Putin’s Three‑Day Ceasefire a Comedy of Errors
Keith Kellogg, America’s special envoy on Ukraine, answered Moscow’s latest pitch with a statement that had all the drama of a reality‑TV finale but also the punchline of a bad joke. “A three‑day ceasefire is absurd,” he declared to Fox News, refusing to let a blink‑and‑you’ll‑miss‑it pause keep the conflict on pause.
Washington’s Pitch: A Permanent Stop‑the‑Fire
While Moscow hovers over a brief breather that would let Russian troops raise their beer mugs for Victory Day, President Biden’s team has a different playbook. Kellogg laid it out like a play: think of a 30‑day freeze—complete shutdown of sea, air, land, and infrastructure. Once that length is met, extending it becomes a simple “yes.”
Why a 30‑Day Slice Matters
- It clarifies the peace terms—no room for sneaky rips.
- It allows both sides to regroup and negotiate seriously.
- It sends a clear signal that Russia can’t just “suspend” fighting for a quick celebration.
Putin’s Plan: A Brief Detour?
Putin’s idea of a three‑day pause sounds like a vacation break, but critics argue it’s a smokescreen. “It barely gives the war a heartbeat pause,” noted Kellogg, implying that the move is more about political theatrics than genuine peace.
Is the Political Stage Ready?
- Washington wants a substantive, lasting ceasefire.
- Moscow’s brief pause feels like a bridge‑style maneuver.
- Both sides must align on ground rules—no side can afford to strike while the snack break is on.
For now, Kellogg stands firm: “The president has this one right on the money,” he said. And as for the rest of the world, the hope is that a longer mute button can eventually turn off the eternal clink of war artillery.
Kyiv rejects Putin’s 72-hour ceasefire and Kremlin says its ‘impossible’ for a 30 day pause in fighting
Putin accused of ‘another attempt of manipulation’ in wanting a three-day ceasefire
Senator warns Putin US ready ‘to turn him and Russia into fish food’
Bradley “JD” Vance Fires Off a Warning: Ukraine “Isn’t Winning” – Nuclear Risk Alert
In a bold move that caught many a pundit off‑guard, the U.S. representative for Ukraine, Bradley Vance—affectionately nicknamed “JD”—stated that the Ukrainians are not pulling ahead in the ongoing conflict. He raises the stakes by warning that a nuclear showdown could loom on the horizon if the war drags on.
What JD Said
- “Ukrainians aren’t winning.” He argued that the escalation has stalled rather than accelerated.
- “There’s a real chance of nuclear war.” JD cautioned that the war’s continuity could push some actors toward drastic measures.
Why the Russians Want a Ceasefire
Russia’s leadership, led by Vladimir Putin, is reportedly looking to declare a brief pause on May 8–10. The Kremlin says the cease‑fire is for “humanitarian grounds,” a move that the Russian president might use as a propaganda tool—“we’ve won the war” is the catch‑phrase he’s set to drop before cheering crowds.
Ukraine’s Stubborn Stance
Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Minister Andrii Sybiha fired back on X, demanding an immediate halt:
“Why wait until May 8? If Russia truly wants peace, they should stop the war now. A 30‑day stop only feels like a parade.”
Those in Kyiv are no fans of a temporary pause—they want a full stop, and the revision of the 22‑point peace proposal is still on the table.
The Marathon of Negotiations
According to a recent discussion quoted by Fox News with editor‑Kellogg, the peace talks resemble a marathon. The early miles may look smooth but the final stretch turns treacherous; that’s what the Ukrainian officials are fighting for:
“The first mile isn’t the hardest; it’s the last one. We’re in the final mile.”
Kellogg added that the “real winner” in the conversation is usually the one who can keep the lights on in the lobby, not the one who claims an independent fight.
Reality Check
In a “no‑winner” military scenario, JD maintains that Russia’s claim of victory is puffery. If Russia were truly winning, the war would have ended long ago – as any cynic would confirm. He acknowledges Ukrainian resilience while nudging Russia to get ready for a long walk in the diplomatic marathon:
“They see themselves as winners, but they’re not. Ukraine’s in a solid position.”
It’s a sobering reminder that there’s no superhero heroism left in the war; it’s all about who’ll finish last and how. And if the tale goes nuclear, the stakes will be… well, literally high.
