Vance Stresses War Won’t End Soon as US Pulls Back From Peace Mediation

US State Department Says America Is Pulling Back From Mediation Between Ukraine and Russia

State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters that Washington has begun to step back from the role of peacemaker in the Ukraine‑Russia conflict.

“We’re not going to be flying around the globe on a whim to resolve every dispute,” Bruce said. “Instead, the two sides must step up and come up with concrete ideas to end this war.”

She emphasized that the U.S. remains committed to supporting peace in Ukraine.
Yet it’s now time for Kyiv and Moscow to take the lead.

In a related note, Vice‑President JD Vance warned on Fox News that “the war in Ukraine will not end any time soon.”

US Congress preparing to authorise the sale of ‘$50m or more’ in military hardware for Ukraine

Kremlin warns ‘millions’ of Russians ready to ‘stand up at any moment’ to mobilise for war

72 US Senators set to vote on ‘bone crushing’ sanctions against Russia

Trump’s New Russia Envoy Sparks Chaos at the White House

Picture the White House as a digital high‑five chaos zone: a freshly appointed special envoy to Russia is causing ripples, and the top brass isn’t exactly thrilled. The envoy’s latest media appearance—complete with blunt language—has the nation talking, and the House aides scrambling.

What the Envoy Said

“We’re handing over the reins: each side—Russia and Ukraine—now knows what the other wants. It’s up to them to pull the damn outcomes together.”
“Negotiations and 100‑day plan: We’ve already put a peace proposal out in the open; the next 100 days, we’re pulling for a “lightning‑fast” deal.”
“If they’re stubborn: “We’ll call them fools and walk away.”

Contrasted with the State Department’s Tone

In a stark contrast, Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the nation that Washington might walk away as mediator if Kyiv and Moscow fail to move. The state spokesperson made it crystal clear: the United States will not be the mediator; the methodology will change.

Why the White House is Concerned

– Inflamed language in public channels might undermine diplomatic credibility.
– Potential conflict of interest between the envoy’s aggressive stance and the official diplomatic position.
– Risk of destabilizing fragile negotiations if the envoy’s approach is too hostile.

What’s Next?

White House staff are busy drafting briefing notes, and a senior adviser is holding a “stay calm” meeting. The situation underscores how political appointments—especially those with a flair for drama—can complicate international peace efforts. For now, the envoy is still at the wheel, pressed on the seat where the Soviet Union didn’t sit long, but the rest of the team keeps a tight grip on the conversation threads.